FreshContextA context lab · Fife
Drawing
02 · Benchmarks
Sheet
2 of 3
Rev
A · 2026-10-01

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct · file← Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

Q6_K

A larger copy, too big to fit in memory, used in August to test running a model from the SSD. Never scored.

Size
65.5 GB
Status
Deleted 14 Aug 2026
Scored runs
0
ResultsNever scored

This file never completed a scored run. Its record below says why.

The recordHow it was made · how it was served · what went wrong · what happened to it

Rebuilt from the lab's records by Claude, an AI model. The results above come straight from the automated runs. How these pages are made.

FileQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct-Q6_K-0000{1,2}-of-00002.gguf, plus a merged single file made here with llama-gguf-split --merge
FormatGGUF Q6_K, 2 shards, "65.5 GB" (61.0 GiB)
Where fromdownloaded ~2026-08-12; repo not on record
Statusdeleted 2026-08-14 (reconstructed)
Hugging Facenot on record

Where it came from

  • Files: models/qwen3-next-80b-a3b/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct-Q6_K-00001-of-00002.gguf plus -00002-of-00002 (path in eval/hypura_test.sh). Total "65.5 GB across 2 shards"; the first shard is 46.3 GB (a lab note, BLOCKER 1).
  • Repo, revision, sha256, download date: not on record. The shard naming and the sibling IQ4_XS's repo make unsloth plausible. That is a guess from a name and is not recorded as provenance.
  • Made here: a merged single file, made because hypura reads only the first shard of a split GGUF and OOMs. The command is recorded generically as llama-gguf-split --merge model-00001-of-00002.gguf merged.gguf (a lab note). The merged filename, the binary build (b10369 era) and the date are not on record. After merging, hypura read "79.7 B / 61.0 GB".

How it was served

labeldates (UTC)binaryctx / -np / KVprofilewhy
— (no run-log label)2026-08-12hypura (t8/hypura, hypura/target/release/hypura, commit not on record) over its vendored llama.cpphypura run <merged> --prompt …; tier placement automaticnonestreaming test: can a model larger than the Metal working set run from NVMe? (eval/hypura_test.sh)

The control arm in hypura_test.sh ran vanilla llama-cli -ngl 99 on the same oversized file. Its outcome is not recorded in the runbook. No seat was held.

Decisions

  • Downloaded as the streaming subject (reconstructed from the runbook's framing; who asked is not on record).
  • Deleted 2026-08-14 with the IQ4_XS, 101 GB in total, when Spumco dropped the model from the fleet (fleet-models.ini REMOVED block). That 101 GB matches IQ4_XS 39.7 GiB + Q6_K 61.0 GiB: reconstructed, because the block does not list files.
  • The practical verdict at the time: "IQ4_XS resident at 41.4 t/s vs Q6_K streamed at 10.5 t/s" (a lab note).

What went wrong

  • hypura mis-plans sharded GGUF. It read 46.3 GB, planned full GPU residency and OOM'd (kIOGPUCommandBufferCallbackErrorOutOfMemory). Fixed by merging first.
  • Its estimator reports "[FAST] — suitable for real-time chat" regardless of the numbers.

What happened to it

Downloaded ~2026-08-12 → merged here → hypura streamed at 10.5 t/s → deleted 2026-08-14 (no RESTORE entry). Later sessions cited the result. Re-downloadable from a Q6_K GGUF repo of this checkpoint; which one is not on record.