FreshContextA context lab · Fife
Drawing
02 · Benchmarks
Sheet
2 of 3
Rev
A · 2026-10-01

Model← Models

Muse-Glimmer 30B

30B dense, UD-Q4_K_XL, 14.8 GB.

Parameters
30B
Quant
UD-Q4_K_XL
Size
14.8 GB
RecordStatus · runtime · seat

muse-glimmer-30b

Measured, not seateddenseresidentllama.cpp

Model card ↗

Outcome as of 20 September 2026, from the seat registry. The write-up below was made when the model was tested.

Why it was tested

Previously dismissed at 10.4 tok/s without ever being scored. Re-examined because it is multimodal, and scanned invoices are the part of the accountancy job nothing else can read.

What came of it

Reproduced at 9.6 tok/s, so the speed verdict stands. But its 32:2 head ratio makes it the most context-efficient model here: 10.6GB of KV at full context against granite's 32GB. Its nullschema is unmeasurable because llama.cpp silently drops the schema for this model specifically. Confirmed on the ladder as the cheapest context here: 1.77 GB of KV across the full 131k window, against granite's 30.26 GB.

Recorded runs2 scored · 95% intervals
SuiteScore95% interval PassedRuntime · profileRecorded
grounding85.6%78.4–90.7Passed 107/125llama.cppextraction2026-09-08
screening86.7%75.8–93.1Passed 52/60llama.cppextraction2026-09-08

Runs marked unenforced were measured through mlx_lm on a suite that requires constrained decoding. mlx_lm accepts the schema and ignores it, so those numbers do not measure what the suite is designed to measure. They are kept and labelled rather than deleted.

Every run log entry for this model (2)
FinishedSuiteRuntime · profileScoreCoverageGrader · dataset · config
groundinggrounding/1llama.cppextraction85.6%Coverage 125/125g 30b933dcc6a7e2d4d dcb396faf8b83b0ac d9d25da365e04cc8
screeningscreening/1llama.cppextraction86.7%Coverage 60/60g 0661b49a10be2d2ad 64c97ca2269c29afc 63338a6fdcbdcddd